Avayeaea; Erion - Celestial Systems of Communications in Part - Jul 15, 2014 - Northern Colorado Mission

Northern Colorado Mission
Teachers:

    1) Avayeaea (spoken: Ahva Eee Yay E Ah), A Spiritual Guide Located on Salvington, the local universe headquarter world under jurisdiction of the Creator Son
    2) Erion - A Spiritual Guide Technician Domiciled on Salvington Created by the Creative Spirit to Provide Communications in the Local Universe


Subject: What Are Spiritual Communication Circuits & How Do they Work
T/R =  Tetrapod
July 15, 2014

Transmitter Tetrapod:
Dear God,  I have several questions:

1. 01  Kindly provide me with any details you can on the nature and mechanisms of the various circuits that I hear reference to on this forum.  In my earthly profession I am considered an expert on communications and networking, so I can handle some level of technical detail.  Specifically:
2. 02   How are the broadcasts represented?  
3. 03   Are they precise language constructs, or are they in a more abstract form?  
4. 04   If two experienced T/R's receive the same broadcast diligently, will their language be identical?  similar?  or only in agreement on broad outlines?  
5. 05   Is it possible to receive the same broadcast by two different people in two different languages?
6. 06   Are broadcasts continuous, occasionally repeated, continuously repeated, or only played once?  Or is the same important information broadcast continuously in slightly different forms?
7. 07   I understand that messages can be either broadcast (to anyone listening), multicast (to a group of people), or unicast (point to point only when sent to an individual).  Is that correct?
8. 08   Are the channels within a circuit allocated to a single broadcast, a topic of broadcast, or is information mixed onto a single channel?
9. 09   Does the human mind "tune-in" to a particular channel, or is there a prioritization of messages in queue for an individual?
10. 10   What number (ballpark) of broadcast channels are available simultaneously to be received by a human?  How can we know where / how to tune in to the most relevant information?

Avayeaea
Dear Tetrapod, we can tell you many things about the celestial circuits that are used to help communicate to your planet, and of course there are some things that we are not permitted to tell you.  

You are correct that there are the three types of circuits that you mentioned.  In addition there are other undisclosed mechanisms.  When you tune in to a broadcast, it is an action that is mediated by your Thought Adjuster.   It is not within your conscious control.  If it were, your human brain would not be able to know how to choose the appropriate "channels" as you call them.  The information s not organized in a way that would make sense to your material mind.  Regarding the number of channels that are active at any one time and the frequency of repetition of a message, let me say that the messages spring from the creativity of spirits beyond your ability to understand.  They are never repeated, in content or words, but the prioritized information is constantly recreated -- reiterated -- in endless forms and continue to echo through the universe in a variety of reflected forms.  These reflections are never the "same" as the original, yet no translatable information is ever lost.  Neither is it directly represented as words or "codons" for which there is a direct translation down to all of the realms of the universe.  Further, it can be received in any language or mindal form without regard to the type of language: auditory, visual, tactile, or other.  You may ask further questions or clarifications if you found this useful. This is Avayeaea relaying information on high from an undisclosed source.


2) (Question from the T/R):
Human scientists are just beginning to understand the mathematics and implications of causality (i.e. cause and effect).  It has largely been a mystery to science up to this point. Is this an area of study that has the potential to yield useful knowledge?  Can you shed any light on the nature of cause and effect, and the mathematics that surround it?

ERION Responds:
Cause and Effect are indeed a mystery to earth humans.  It is not a universe mystery, as it is thoroughly understood by our scientists and mathematicians.  It is a science that will surely enable great strides once the mystery is unraveled.  I cannot of course give you any information that would allow developments that are beyond current human capabilities, but I can give you deep insights that have been understood by humans who have been working long in this field.  

CAUSALITY is very tightly tied to WILL.  Understanding will and understanding causality can not be teased apart.  Will is the determination of a divine being (such as yourself in conjunction with your TA (Editor: TA is short for Thought Adjuster) to cause an action to occur.  In that, it is also related to INTENTION.  

Intention is a weakly developed  aspect of the human mind and spirit that is very tightly tied to MORONTIAL MOTA (Editor: morontial is an adjective of morontia, and that is an aspect of living form made up of spirit and matter, and in-between state of human forms and spirit forms; mota is a mind aspect added to the morontial form that allows another mind dimension to address intellectual problems) --  an aspect of spirit that is related to CREATIVITY itself.  

As you probably are aware, creativity is always from the spirit.  When you take [personal] credit for your creativity, you do to a certain extent, dampen the receipt of future creativity.  It seems to originate in your mind, but it does not.  By enhancing the flow of creativity from your spirit self you are given opportunities to exercise will.  Will is effectively the choosing among inspired creative ideas presented by the spirit within.   The development of intention is the exercise of the will, which is also the source of FAITH.  An event can only be said to be cause if it is born of intent and shepherded by the will of a personality.  

And of course, here we are talking about proximate cause, as opposed to ultimate or primal cause.  In the example you like to use:  Does the rooster crowing cause the sun to rise, or does the sun, in fact, cause the rooster to crow as it rises.  In this simple example, neither can be said to be causal, though the sun rising is actually "more causal" than the rooster crowing.  What does that mean?  The sun "rising" is clearly an act of will of the various Deities that have participated in the organization of the physical universe, ultimately originating in the father and the divine mother (as you prefer to refer to the 3rd source and center).   Furthermore, the crowing of the rooster has causes originating in the history of the species, and further causes reaching back to the advent of life on this planet as mediated by the Life-givers.

It is therefore easy to see that the chains of causalities go deep and far and ultimately lead back to the I AM of the first source and center.  So the structure of these relationships in your terminology would be an Acyclic Directed Graph.  originating (rooted) at the Father, and extending in a unique graph for each potential event, and each actual event.  

You can see that the causal chain extends deep into absonity (Editor: absonity is a word that describes one of the reality levels which transcend time.)  This is one of the reasons that human minds have a difficult time working with the topic -- it requires that the causal chain continue through a mixture of materials:  physical, morontial, absonite, etc.  This requires slightly different models be used in each layer.  The concepts of multi-levelate universe, as you have understood it, also must be brought to bear as the causal chain is linked at all levelates and through the various Triunities (Editor - Triunities are Trinity sub-sets or Committees beyond time that recommend actions for existential universe considerations), events, or personalities, etc along the chain.  

Let's call these, for simplicity of expression, focalates.  There is a directed relationship between each pair of focalates, which in the physical world corresponds to causality.  As will is the source of cause, each focalate in the chain corresponds to an act of will by an actor or personality.  The transition between physical causality and morontial motations (Editor: root word is mota (see above) and motations are the net result of cause and effect), are related to a deeper understanding of will, which we shan't go into here.  
In the physical realm, these must be understood as a link that exists to represent a quantitative or qualitative transformation  that is unidirectional; i.e. the results are unanimous and have no conflict between cause and effect in the outcome.  This mathematics (Editor; i.e., cause and effect is like an equation) is best understood if rendered as a declarative form, which, yes, is related to the absonite concept of eventuation (Editor: eventuation is an absonite reality term and means to appear through re-motion of effects created in time that were time-perfected by the Supreme.)  These rules can be defined using familiar algorithmic processes.  Note that algorithms, like causal relationships, are not reversible.  Contrast this to algebraic expressions for which you can solve any variable by reversing or otherwise transforming the expression.  

So the use of declarative rules would be the best way for you to represent the causal relationship.  Declarative rules is the eventuation that ultimately brings the cause and the effect into being -- that is the causal relationship.  One can develop many forms and syntaxes (Editor; that is, the order of how things play out through causes to the final effect), of these rules in order to model the relationship.  The fundamental form of these rules can be discrete or probabilistic and different mechanisms would be used in each case.

I hope I have answered your questions at the level that you were searching for.  I am Erion and you would consider me a graduate student in this area.  Love and blessings to you.  We do enjoy being called into service to answer questions such as these.  It is our greatest joy to be able to use our knowledge, for which we have studied so hard, in uplifting other souls.
END